Considering Whistleblowing On Your
Employer?
An employee who became a Whistleblower at one time had to be
a really brave individual who could be going out on a limb and
risking his job, his career opportunity within the company or
even outside it. Any person who considers that his company or
one or more of his colleagues are committing acts that against
the best interest of the company, their employees, their
customers or against the common good, he or she should consider
the significance of their acts before taking their findings or
theories a stage further.
They should consider the following:
* Is their findings based on fact or supposition?
* Is the person or persons involved in suspicious activities
acting alone or are there more people involved?
* If they are totally convinced that dishonest activities are
going on in the company, to who should the report it? A company
official, the press, tax authorities or the police?
* Should they preserve their anonymity or should they come out
into the open with their disclosures?
Nowadays there are series of legislations in effect across
the United States relating to the issue of whistleblowing.
However they are still pretty spurious and undefined. The
accent is towards protecting the interests of the public sector
and publicly owned corporations. Anyone working for a privately
owned company who suspects that wrong doing is afoot, is not
such a strong position, however they do have some level of
protection.
Employees who report their employers for wrong doing cannot
be fired or even demoted for doing so. In fact, a recent law
states that they might even be liable for promotion. While it
sounds very fair on paper, it practical terms it is very
possible to question the fact these laws could ever be put into
practice in the private sector. Any well meaning citizen who
witnesses "under the table" or dubious business dealings,
should be prepared to seek employment elsewhere or preserve his
anonymity before blowing the whistle.
Employees of public companies are in a much stronger
position and now have the right to inform the federal
government about possible corporate scandals. There have been
cases when the whistleblower's suspicions have been proved to
be unfounded; however the fact that they reported the situation
to their employers for investigation was viewed in a positive
light.
These anomalies in the practical application of the law
display the problematic issues with whistleblowing between the
private and public sectors. Anyone considering whistleblowing,
especially those involved in the private sector, depending on
the nature of the offense and its urgency might well be advised
to consult with a lawyer before bringing their suspicions to
the relevant authorities.
|